Monday, January 01, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The Rules of the Game
This blog is philosophical in nature. I ask, then, that discussion concern only the views expressed and the arguments for them. Dissent is welcome. Personal attacks or speculation about motive are not. If this rule seems burdensome, please find another forum in which to express yourself. If this rule is not observed, you will be politely asked to make your exit. (I find it extraordinary that I was forced to state this rule. It had seemed so obvious to me, so clear, that it had not even occurred to me to state it. But hard experience has made me see the necessity of it.)
Who am I?
- Dr. M
- Lafatyette, IN, United States
Why "Philosophical Midwife"?
If you're curious about the title of the blog, I explain its sense here. (I should say as well that I searched many days in vain for a title not already taken. "Philosophical Midwife" was not my first choice.)
A Perennial
Like plants, blogs are of two sorts. Annuals are composed of posts meant to have only temporary interest. Their posts "die" soon after they appear. Perennials on the other hand are composed of posts that are like chapters in a book. Their posts last (or at least are meant to last). The Philosophical Midwife is a perennial. So please do read old posts. Though I've since abandoned the views expressed in some, all will repay study (even if only to isolate their errors). I will read and likely respond to every comment, no matter how old the post.
Topics
- Abortion (2)
- Aphorisms (8)
- Biblical Authority (7)
- Biblical Positivism (1)
- Chief End of Man (5)
- Christology (5)
- Church of Christ (5)
- Death (1)
- Death and Dying (1)
- Education of the Young (2)
- Epistemology (3)
- Euthanasia (1)
- Evangelical Christianity (9)
- Evil (3)
- Family (3)
- Forgiveness (3)
- Foundations of the Christian Faith (2)
- Human Genesis (1)
- Human Origins (3)
- In vitro fertilisation (2)
- Inerrancy (8)
- Logic (3)
- Love (8)
- Marriage (3)
- Metaphysics (5)
- Meticulous Conscience (1)
- Miracles (1)
- Moral Theory (18)
- My Faith (5)
- My Hope (2)
- Natural Law (1)
- Our Knowledge of God (4)
- Pedagogy (1)
- Philosophical Lexicon (1)
- Philosophical Papers (2)
- Poetry (1)
- Practical Christianity (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Questions for Christians (4)
- Relativism (2)
- Religion and Politics (6)
- Righteousness (1)
- Salvation (8)
- Science (1)
- Science and Christianity (1)
- Sin (7)
- Site Matters (3)
- Substitutionary Atonement (2)
- The Atonement (4)
- The Doctrine of Hell (4)
- The Fall (1)
- The Place of Women within the Christian Church (2)
- The Problem of Evil (2)
- The Rationality of Christian Belief (4)
- Theodicy (4)
- Theology (12)
- True Desire (1)
- Truth (1)
- Why I Am a Christian (6)
Archive
-
▼
2007
(53)
-
▼
January
(18)
- Problem of Evil: The Structure of the Debate
- Anonymous Christians
- The Chief End of Man
- Universal Reconciliation
- The "Silver Bullet" School of Scriptural Interpret...
- Still an Analytic: Does Present Duty Reflect Futur...
- Brown Replies
- Matter and Spirit
- Are We Lovable in God's Eyes?
- Does IVF Render Children Mere Objects?
- Turn or Burn
- Let the Argument Speak
- Like Lock and Key
- Do We Feel God?
- Midwifery
- God's Love
- On Righteousness and the Fate of the Soul
- If There is a Being Who Would Condemn
-
▼
January
(18)
1 comment:
I know nothing about your family and I assume that hell will not be part of their future. That being said, consider how God might rephrase your statement for his own purposes.
If there is a being who would reject my loving offer of forgiveness and, in contemptuous pride, forever refuse to bend his knee before me, I stand against him. I stand against him only because he stands against me. If he did not stand against me I would gladly stand with him. In so far as he stands against me, he is my enemy, and I will not allow him in my presence. He doesn't desire me and so I leave him to what he truly desires - himself.
Post a Comment